Risk protections
Life Insurance Design & Implementation
New coverage should match a real, quantified obligation — not a round number. And a policy placed years ago rarely gets a second look, even as the assumptions behind it quietly stop holding. We do both: place what’s needed, and audit what’s already there.
Who this is for
Anyone with an obligation to fund, or a policy to check
Individuals and families sizing coverage for the first time, or after a life change. Business owners funding a specific need — a buy-sell, a key person, a loan guarantee. Trustees of irrevocable trusts, who carry a legal duty to monitor the policy the trust owns. Anyone holding a permanent policy placed a decade or more ago, or who has received a premium-increase notice and doesn’t know whether to pay it.
Design & implementation
Placing coverage that matches the obligation
Needs-based sizing
We quantify the actual obligation — income replacement, a buy-sell figure, an estate-liquidity need — before we talk product, so the coverage amount and structure follow the number, not a rule of thumb.
Carrier-independent placement
We take the requirement to the market across our appointments, compare contract language and underwriting posture, and advocate through underwriting on complicated cases.
Ownership and beneficiary design
Coordinated with your attorney so the policy and the governing document — a buy-sell agreement, a trust — say the same thing.
In-force review
Why policies drift
Underfunded universal life
Policies illustrated at 1990s or 2000s crediting rates that never materialized. The cash value erodes, and premiums must rise sharply — or the policy lapses — often just as the insured reaches the age the coverage was bought for.
Conversion deadlines
Term policies carry a limited window to convert to permanent coverage without new underwriting. That window closes quietly.
Trustee exposure
A trustee who never reviews a trust-owned policy has an uninsured liability. A periodic documented review is the standard of care.
Better contracts available
Underwriting improvements, newer product designs, or a change in health can make a 1035 exchange worthwhile — or confirm that the existing policy should be left alone.
The review engagement
A defined process, with a memo at the end
- Order current in-force ledgers from the carrier at several funding levels.
- Analyze whether the policy sustains to life expectancy and beyond, and at what premium.
- Compare the market — product, carrier strength, and underwriting — where a change might help.
- Evaluate a 1035 exchange on its merits, including surrender charges and new contestability.
- Deliver a written recommendation the client, or the trustee, can file — including “keep this policy as is.”
Note: “Leave the existing policy alone” is a common outcome, and we will say so plainly when it is the right one.
Note: A life insurance policy can also be structured with a long-term-care acceleration rider — a hybrid approach that uses the life insurance chassis to address an LTC need specifically. See Long-Term Care Planning.
Related protections and strategies